그래픽 카드 성능 순위와 RTX4090 성능 비교해보기 (400종)
컴퓨터 그래픽카드는 게임 뿐만 아니라 3D 작업할 때도 많이 필요한 컴퓨터 부품 중 하나입니다.
그 외에 연산 작업에도 쓰이고 때로는 코인 채굴 작업에도 사용되죠. 그 용도만큼이나 그래픽카드의 종류도 많고 성능도 각양각색인데요.
원하는 그래픽카드와 하이엔드급 그래픽카드 와의 성능 비교를 통해 원하는 모델명을 골라보면 좋을 듯 합니다.
그리고 같은 라인업에서도 데스크탑용과 노트북용 그래픽카드는 성능 차이가 큰데요.
노트북 그래픽카드 성능을 파악하려면 동일 라인업의 데스크탑 그래픽카드와 비교해볼 필요도 있을 듯 합니다.
(예를 들면 GeForce RTX 3070 데스크탑용 VS GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU은 거의 25%~30% 정도 차이 발생)
목차
성능 순위(1위 ~ 50위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 2 | GeForce RTX 4080 | 89.32% | 1,139.00 | 1,480,700 |
| 3 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 80.77% | 799.99 | 1,039,987 |
| 4 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 80.77% | 979.99 | 1,273,987 |
| 5 | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 77.62% | - | - |
| 6 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 75.42% | 1,685.66 | 2,191,358 |
| 7 | Radeon RX 7900 XT | 74.20% | 799.99 | 1,039,987 |
| 8 | Radeon RX 6950 XT | 73.86% | 629.99 | 818,987 |
| 9 | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 69.54% | - | - |
| 10 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 69.33% | 1,143.99 | 1,487,187 |
| 11 | Radeon RX 6900 XT | 68.25% | 580.73 | 754,949 |
| 12 | GeForce RTX 3090 | 68.13% | 1,762.99 | 2,291,887 |
| 13 | GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 67.83% | - | - |
| 14 | GeForce RTX 4070 | 67.20% | 599.99 | 779,987 |
| 15 | GeForce RTX 3080 | 64.25% | 929.99 | 1,208,987 |
| 16 | Radeon RX 6800 XT | 63.37% | 509.99 | 662,987 |
| 17 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 60.21% | 519.99 | 675,987 |
| 18 | RTX A5000 | 59.00% | 2,141.99 | 2,784,587 |
| 19 | RTX A6000 | 57.05% | 4,673.98 | 6,076,174 |
| 20 | GeForce RTX 3070 | 56.84% | 499.99 | 649,987 |
| 21 | Radeon RX 6800 | 56.78% | 426.99 | 555,087 |
| 22 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 55.26% | 1,124.99 | 1,462,487 |
| 23 | Radeon RX 6750 XT | 54.51% | 449.99 | 584,987 |
| 24 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 53.20% | - | - |
| 25 | RTX A4500 | 52.59% | 1,079.99 | 1,403,987 |
| 26 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 52.12% | 379.99 | 493,987 |
| 27 | NVIDIA A10 | 51.99% | - | - |
| 28 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 51.66% | - | - |
| 29 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 51.52% | - | - |
| 30 | TITAN V | 50.30% | 1,999.99 | 2,599,987 |
| 31 | Radeon RX 6700 XT | 50.28% | 349.99 | 454,987 |
| 32 | TITAN RTX | 50.24% | 2,794.99 | 3,633,487 |
| 33 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 49.79% | - | - |
| 34 | Radeon PRO W6800 | 49.48% | 1,849.99 | 2,404,987 |
| 35 | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 49.45% | 740.99 | 963,287 |
| 36 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 49.11% | - | - |
| 37 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | 48.98% | - | - |
| 38 | Quadro RTX 8000 | 48.98% | 4,741.49 | 6,163,937 |
| 39 | Quadro GV100 | 48.80% | 8,999.00 | 11,698,700 |
| 40 | TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION | 48.74% | - | - |
| 41 | RTX A4000 | 48.26% | 749.99 | 974,987 |
| 42 | Radeon RX 6700 | 48.26% | - | - |
| 43 | Quadro RTX 6000 | 48.24% | 6,300.00 | 8,190,000 |
| 44 | Radeon RX 6850M XT | 47.65% | - | - |
| 45 | GeForce RTX 2080 | 47.52% | 797.05 | 1,036,165 |
| 46 | NVIDIA A10G | 47.28% | - | - |
| 47 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | 47.24% | 1,645.00 | 2,138,500 |
| 48 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 46.81% | - | - |
| 49 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 46.75% | 483.82 | 628,966 |
| 50 | Tesla P40 | 46.38% | - | - |
성능 순위(51위 ~ 100위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 51 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 46.10% | 618.47 | 804,011 |
| 52 | RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 45.98% | - | - |
| 53 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 45.26% | - | - |
| 54 | RTX A4500 Laptop GPU | 45.17% | - | - |
| 55 | A40-48Q | 45.11% | - | - |
| 56 | Radeon RX 6650 XT | 44.96% | 279.99 | 363,987 |
| 57 | Radeon Pro W5700X | 44.42% | - | - |
| 58 | Radeon RX 6600S | 43.85% | - | - |
| 59 | RTX A5500 | 43.78% | 2,169.99 | 2,820,987 |
| 60 | GeForce RTX 3060 | 43.46% | 324.99 | 422,487 |
| 61 | TITAN V CEO Edition | 42.89% | - | - |
| 62 | Radeon RX 5700 XT | 42.83% | 459.99 | 597,987 |
| 63 | Radeon Pro VII | 42.55% | - | - |
| 64 | Radeon VII | 42.44% | 1,899.95 | 2,469,935 |
| 65 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 42.26% | - | - |
| 66 | GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 42.18% | - | - |
| 67 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | 41.95% | - | - |
| 68 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 41.93% | 388.08 | 504,504 |
| 69 | Radeon RX 6600 XT | 41.70% | 254.99 | 331,487 |
| 70 | Tesla V100-SXM2-16GB | 40.99% | - | - |
| 71 | GeForce RTX 2070 | 40.84% | 269.99 | 350,987 |
| 72 | Quadro RTX 5000 | 40.83% | - | - |
| 73 | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | 40.34% | - | - |
| 74 | Radeon PRO W6600 | 40.31% | - | - |
| 75 | RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | 40.28% | - | - |
| 76 | Miracast display port driver V3 | 40.17% | - | - |
| 77 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | 40.08% | - | - |
| 78 | RTX A4000 Laptop GPU | 40.02% | - | - |
| 79 | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 39.85% | - | - |
| 80 | Quadro P6000 | 39.68% | 3,250.00 | 4,225,000 |
| 81 | Radeon Pro W5700 | 39.47% | 649.99 | 844,987 |
| 82 | Quadro GP100 | 39.41% | - | - |
| 83 | Radeon Pro Vega II | 39.37% | - | - |
| 84 | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 39.30% | - | - |
| 85 | GeForce GTX 1080 | 39.08% | 442.79 | 575,627 |
| 86 | Quadro RTX 4000 | 39.06% | 899.00 | 1,168,700 |
| 87 | Radeon RX 6800S | 38.34% | - | - |
| 88 | Radeon RX 6600 | 38.33% | 329.00 | 427,700 |
| 89 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | 38.15% | - | - |
| 90 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | 37.45% | - | - |
| 91 | Radeon RX 5700 | 37.18% | 309.99 | 402,987 |
| 92 | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 37.09% | 578.40 | 751,920 |
| 93 | RTX A3000 12GB Laptop GPU | 36.99% | - | - |
| 94 | Radeon RX Vega 64 | 36.95% | 749.99 | 974,987 |
| 95 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | 36.94% | - | - |
| 96 | Radeon RX 6700S | 36.68% | - | - |
| 97 | Radeon 6700 | 35.75% | - | - |
| 98 | GeForce RTX 2060 | 35.61% | 289.99 | 376,987 |
| 99 | RTX A2000 12GB | 35.41% | - | - |
| 100 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | 35.41% | - | - |
성능 순위(101위 ~ 150위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 101 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | 35.16% | 1,599.39 | 2,079,207 |
| 102 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.07% | 796.15 | 1,034,995 |
| 103 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | 34.99% | - | - |
| 104 | Radeon RX 5600 XT | 34.94% | 545.00 | 708,500 |
| 105 | RTX A2000 | 34.82% | 419.00 | 544,700 |
| 106 | GeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design | 34.63% | - | - |
| 107 | NVIDIA TITAN X | 34.49% | 608.10 | 790,530 |
| 108 | Radeon RX Vega 56 | 34.31% | 752.99 | 978,887 |
| 109 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | 34.22% | - | - |
| 110 | GeForce GTX 1070 | 34.14% | 488.09 | 634,517 |
| 111 | Radeon RX 6600M | 34.04% | 199.99 | 259,987 |
| 112 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | 33.99% | 1,679.99 | 2,183,987 |
| 113 | Radeon RX 6700M | 33.90% | 289.99 | 376,987 |
| 114 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 33.63% | 309.99 | 402,987 |
| 115 | A10-8Q | 33.42% | - | - |
| 116 | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | 33.30% | 2,099.99 | 2,729,987 |
| 117 | GeForce GTX TITAN X | 33.22% | 1,096.99 | 1,426,087 |
| 118 | Radeon PRO W6600X | 33.11% | - | - |
| 119 | GeForce RTX 3050 | 32.91% | 269.99 | 350,987 |
| 120 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 32.69% | 321.60 | 418,080 |
| 121 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | 32.62% | - | - |
| 122 | Quadro P5200 | 32.44% | - | - |
| 123 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 32.35% | 239.99 | 311,987 |
| 124 | Radeon RX 6800M | 32.28% | - | - |
| 125 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM | 32.16% | - | - |
| 126 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | 32.04% | - | - |
| 127 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | 32.03% | - | - |
| 128 | Quadro P5200 with Max-Q Design | 31.96% | - | - |
| 129 | Tesla T10 | 31.94% | - | - |
| 130 | Radeon RX 6650M | 31.86% | - | - |
| 131 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | 31.83% | - | - |
| 132 | RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 31.55% | - | - |
| 133 | Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design | 31.33% | - | - |
| 134 | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) | 31.27% | - | - |
| 135 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | 31.19% | - | - |
| 136 | Radeon RX 6850M | 30.99% | - | - |
| 137 | Quadro P5000 | 30.98% | 1,868.99 | 2,429,687 |
| 138 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | 30.95% | - | - |
| 139 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | 30.30% | - | - |
| 140 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | 30.06% | - | - |
| 141 | Quadro M6000 24GB | 29.99% | - | - |
| 142 | Radeon Pro 5700 | 29.91% | - | - |
| 143 | Quadro M6000 | 29.88% | 4,827.53 | 6,275,789 |
| 144 | GeForce GTX 1660 | 29.65% | 309.99 | 402,987 |
| 145 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | 29.16% | - | - |
| 146 | Quadro P4000 | 29.10% | 556.19 | 723,047 |
| 147 | Radeon RX 5600 | 28.77% | - | - |
| 148 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | 28.67% | - | - |
| 149 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | 28.67% | - | - |
| 150 | RTX A1000 6GB Laptop GPU | 28.22% | - | - |
성능 순위(151위 ~ 200위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 151 | GeForce GTX 980 | 28.15% | 247.35 | 321,555 |
| 152 | Quadro RTX 3000 | 27.90% | - | - |
| 153 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | 27.89% | - | - |
| 154 | GRID P40-12Q | 27.85% | - | - |
| 155 | RTX A2000 8GB Laptop GPU | 27.49% | - | - |
| 156 | Tesla T4 | 27.44% | 4,646.99 | 6,041,087 |
| 157 | Radeon Pro SSG | 26.51% | 2,410.15 | 3,133,195 |
| 158 | Tesla M40 24GB | 26.45% | - | - |
| 159 | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | 26.42% | - | - |
| 160 | Quadro P4200 | 26.37% | - | - |
| 161 | Tesla M40 | 25.79% | 600.00 | 780,000 |
| 162 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | 25.67% | - | - |
| 163 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 25.52% | 285.38 | 370,994 |
| 164 | RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 25.51% | - | - |
| 165 | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 25.50% | - | - |
| 166 | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | 25.47% | - | - |
| 167 | GeForce GTX 1060 | 25.43% | 279.99 | 363,987 |
| 168 | Radeon R9 Fury X | 25.40% | - | - |
| 169 | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | 24.68% | - | - |
| 170 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 24.60% | 269.99 | 350,987 |
| 171 | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | 24.60% | 449.99 | 584,987 |
| 172 | GeForce GTX 970 | 24.35% | 237.99 | 309,387 |
| 173 | Radeon R9 Fury | 24.25% | 443.10 | 576,030 |
| 174 | Radeon RX 590 | 24.16% | 549.99 | 714,987 |
| 175 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 24.12% | - | - |
| 176 | RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | 23.99% | - | - |
| 177 | Radeon RX 6500 XT | 23.93% | 159.99 | 207,987 |
| 178 | Radeon Ryzen 9 4900HSS | 23.89% | - | - |
| 179 | Radeon R9 390X | 23.87% | - | - |
| 180 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 23.83% | 339.99 | 441,987 |
| 181 | Quadro P2200 | 23.68% | 459.80 | 597,740 |
| 182 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | 23.61% | 269.99 | 350,987 |
| 183 | Quadro M5000 | 23.53% | 499.00 | 648,700 |
| 184 | Radeon Pro 5600M | 23.43% | - | - |
| 185 | Radeon RX 5500 XT | 23.28% | 184.99 | 240,487 |
| 186 | NVIDIA A40 | 23.15% | - | - |
| 187 | Quadro P3200 with Max-Q Design | 23.14% | - | - |
| 188 | Radeon Pro W5500 | 23.13% | 409.99 | 532,987 |
| 189 | Quadro P4000 with Max-Q Design | 22.93% | - | - |
| 190 | Radeon R9 390 | 22.92% | - | - |
| 191 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | 22.87% | 524.99 | 682,487 |
| 192 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | 22.69% | 1,515.00 | 1,969,500 |
| 193 | Radeon RX 580 | 22.51% | 179.99 | 233,987 |
| 194 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | 22.50% | 487.99 | 634,387 |
| 195 | Radeon RX 5500 | 22.21% | - | - |
| 196 | Tesla P4 | 22.14% | - | - |
| 197 | Radeon R9 290X | 22.06% | - | - |
| 198 | Quadro P3200 | 22.02% | 389.30 | 506,090 |
| 199 | Radeon RX 480 | 21.95% | 339.99 | 441,987 |
| 200 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design | 21.93% | - | - |
성능 순위(201위 ~ 250위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 201 | Radeon R9 295X2 | 21.81% | 499.10 | 648,830 |
| 202 | Intel Arc A770 | 21.78% | 339.99 | 441,987 |
| 203 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design | 21.77% | - | - |
| 204 | Radeon R9 290 | 21.22% | - | - |
| 205 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X | 21.18% | 319.99 | 415,987 |
| 206 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | 21.11% | - | - |
| 207 | Radeon RX590 GME | 21.06% | - | - |
| 208 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | 21.02% | - | - |
| 209 | Radeon Pro Duo | 20.94% | 1,199.06 | 1,558,778 |
| 210 | Tesla V100-PCIE-32GB | 20.86% | - | - |
| 211 | Intel Arc A750 | 20.80% | 249.99 | 324,987 |
| 212 | GeForce GTX Titan | 20.72% | 745.00 | 968,500 |
| 213 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | 20.61% | - | - |
| 214 | Radeon R9 290 / 390 | 20.58% | 380.00 | 494,000 |
| 215 | Ryzen 5 4600HS with Radeon Graphics | 20.51% | - | - |
| 216 | Radeon RX 470/570 | 20.40% | 388.99 | 505,687 |
| 217 | Radeon Ryzen 9 6900HS | 20.37% | - | - |
| 218 | Quadro K6000 | 20.37% | 210.66 | 273,858 |
| 219 | GeForce GTX 780 | 20.27% | 279.99 | 363,987 |
| 220 | Ryzen 9 6900HS | 20.21% | - | - |
| 221 | FirePro W9100 | 20.02% | 1,729.99 | 2,248,987 |
| 222 | Radeon RX 6500M | 20.02% | - | - |
| 223 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | 19.99% | - | - |
| 224 | Quadro M5500 | 19.99% | - | - |
| 225 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | 19.97% | 1,047.99 | 1,362,387 |
| 226 | GeForce GTX 1650 | 19.82% | 159.99 | 207,987 |
| 227 | Radeon PRO W6400 | 19.80% | - | - |
| 228 | Radeon RX 580X | 19.69% | - | - |
| 229 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | 19.67% | - | - |
| 230 | Tesla M60 | 19.62% | 787.90 | 1,024,270 |
| 231 | Radeon RX 5600M | 19.61% | - | - |
| 232 | Radeon Pro 580 | 19.58% | - | - |
| 233 | T1200 Laptop GPU | 19.50% | - | - |
| 234 | T1000 | 19.45% | 342.99 | 445,887 |
| 235 | Radeon Ryzen 9 4900HS | 19.41% | - | - |
| 236 | Radeon RX 5300 | 19.35% | - | - |
| 237 | T1000 8GB | 19.22% | - | - |
| 238 | Radeon Pro 580X | 19.04% | - | - |
| 239 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | 19.03% | - | - |
| 240 | Tesla M6 | 18.96% | 199.00 | 258,700 |
| 241 | Radeon Pro 5300 | 18.92% | - | - |
| 242 | Radeon RX 6400 | 18.80% | 169.99 | 220,987 |
| 243 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800HS | 18.59% | - | - |
| 244 | GeForce GTX 980M | 18.53% | 289.99 | 376,987 |
| 245 | Radeon Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core | 18.51% | - | - |
| 246 | FirePro W8100 | 18.47% | 704.00 | 915,200 |
| 247 | Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB | 18.24% | - | - |
| 248 | Quadro T2000 | 18.14% | 528.35 | 686,855 |
| 249 | Tesla K80 | 17.74% | 593.95 | 772,135 |
| 250 | Quadro P2000 | 17.73% | 459.99 | 597,987 |
성능 순위(251위 ~ 300위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 251 | Quadro M5000M | 17.72% | 546.92 | 710,996 |
| 252 | Intel Arc A770M | 17.69% | - | - |
| 253 | Ryzen 7 4800HS with Radeon Graphics | 17.67% | - | - |
| 254 | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) | 17.60% | - | - |
| 255 | T600 Laptop GPU | 17.51% | - | - |
| 256 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 17.40% | - | - |
| 257 | Ryzen 7 6800HS with Radeon Graphics | 17.34% | - | - |
| 258 | Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design | 17.32% | - | - |
| 259 | Radeon Pro 5500M | 17.22% | - | - |
| 260 | GeForce RTX 2050 | 17.20% | - | - |
| 261 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | 16.94% | - | - |
| 262 | Radeon R9 285 | 16.87% | - | - |
| 263 | Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design | 16.81% | - | - |
| 264 | Quadro M4000 | 16.76% | 362.00 | 470,600 |
| 265 | RTX A500 Laptop GPU | 16.69% | - | - |
| 266 | Quadro T1000 | 16.62% | 441.99 | 574,587 |
| 267 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | 16.61% | - | - |
| 268 | Quadro P3000 | 16.54% | - | - |
| 269 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | 16.51% | - | - |
| 270 | T600 | 16.42% | 239.99 | 311,987 |
| 271 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design | 16.08% | - | - |
| 272 | Radeon Pro 570 | 16.00% | - | - |
| 273 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 15.89% | 201.45 | 261,885 |
| 274 | Quadro M4000M | 15.84% | 254.91 | 331,383 |
| 275 | Radeon R9 380X | 15.81% | 349.99 | 454,987 |
| 276 | Radeon R9 280X | 15.77% | - | - |
| 277 | Radeon R9 380 | 15.76% | 89.99 | 116,987 |
| 278 | FirePro W9000 | 15.50% | 845.00 | 1,098,500 |
| 279 | GeForce MX570 A | 15.39% | - | - |
| 280 | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design | 15.25% | - | - |
| 281 | GeForce GTX 960 | 15.21% | 172.00 | 223,600 |
| 282 | Radeon Pro 5300M | 15.08% | - | - |
| 283 | GRID P100-16Q | 15.01% | - | - |
| 284 | Quadro K5200 | 14.99% | 415.00 | 539,500 |
| 285 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | 14.95% | - | - |
| 286 | GeForce GTX 770 | 14.84% | 249.00 | 323,700 |
| 287 | P106-100 | 14.79% | - | - |
| 288 | Ryzen 9 6900HS with Radeon Graphics | 14.71% | - | - |
| 289 | Ryzen 9 5900HS with Radeon Graphics | 14.67% | - | - |
| 290 | A16 | 14.64% | - | - |
| 291 | Radeon PRO Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U | 14.63% | - | - |
| 292 | Radeon Ryzen 9 7900 12-Core | 14.60% | - | - |
| 293 | GeForce MX570 | 14.58% | - | - |
| 294 | GeForce GTX 970M | 14.47% | 209.99 | 272,987 |
| 295 | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H | 14.29% | - | - |
| 296 | Radeon Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | 14.25% | - | - |
| 297 | Radeon Ryzen 7 7735H | 14.22% | - | - |
| 298 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | 14.17% | 359.99 | 467,987 |
| 299 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS Creator Edition | 14.16% | - | - |
| 300 | Radeon R9 280 | 14.11% | - | - |
성능 순위(301위 ~ 350위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 301 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H | 14.11% | - | - |
| 302 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U | 14.09% | - | - |
| 303 | NVIDIA A40-12Q | 14.07% | - | - |
| 304 | Radeon HD 7990 | 14.05% | 399.99 | 519,987 |
| 305 | GeForce GTX 690 | 14.03% | 280.99 | 365,287 |
| 306 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | 14.01% | 485.00 | 630,500 |
| 307 | GeForce GTX 680 | 13.96% | 399.00 | 518,700 |
| 308 | GRID M60-8A | 13.95% | - | - |
| 309 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | 13.70% | - | - |
| 310 | Ryzen 9 6900HX | 13.68% | - | - |
| 311 | Quadro M3000M | 13.66% | 159.95 | 207,935 |
| 312 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | 13.59% | - | - |
| 313 | Radeon Ryzen 7 7736U | 13.58% | - | - |
| 314 | GRID P40-4Q | 13.55% | - | - |
| 315 | Ryzen 7 6800HS Creator Edition | 13.50% | - | - |
| 316 | GeForce GTX 950 | 13.48% | 141.99 | 184,587 |
| 317 | GeForce GTX 670 | 13.38% | 193.98 | 252,174 |
| 318 | FirePro W7100 | 13.37% | 389.30 | 506,090 |
| 319 | Radeon Ryzen 7 7735HS | 13.29% | - | - |
| 320 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | 13.25% | 246.99 | 321,087 |
| 321 | Ryzen 7 6800H | 13.25% | - | - |
| 322 | Ryzen 7 6800HS | 13.22% | - | - |
| 323 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 13.20% | - | - |
| 324 | Radeon HD 8990 | 13.17% | - | - |
| 325 | GRID M60-2Q | 13.14% | - | - |
| 326 | Radeon Ryzen 9 6900HX | 13.06% | - | - |
| 327 | Radeon Ryzen 7 7735U | 13.04% | - | - |
| 328 | Q12U-1 | 13.04% | - | - |
| 329 | Radeon R9 M295X | 13.00% | 1,449.00 | 1,883,700 |
| 330 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | 12.99% | 297.50 | 386,750 |
| 331 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | 12.97% | - | - |
| 332 | Radeon RX 5500M | 12.93% | - | - |
| 333 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z | 12.82% | - | - |
| 334 | Radeon Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | 12.80% | - | - |
| 335 | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS with Radeon Graphics | 12.80% | - | - |
| 336 | GeForce GTX 1630 | 12.79% | 143.40 | 186,420 |
| 337 | Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design | 12.78% | - | - |
| 338 | FirePro S9000 | 12.77% | - | - |
| 339 | Radeon R9 M395 | 12.76% | - | - |
| 340 | Radeon Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U | 12.75% | - | - |
| 341 | EIZO Quadro MED-XN51LP | 12.75% | - | - |
| 342 | Ryzen 7 6800U | 12.75% | - | - |
| 343 | GeForce GTX 1050 | 12.74% | 239.99 | 311,987 |
| 344 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U with Radeon Graphics | 12.54% | - | - |
| 345 | Barco MXRT 7600 | 12.48% | 602.59 | 783,367 |
| 346 | Radeon R9 270X | 12.43% | 326.50 | 424,450 |
| 347 | FirePro S9050 | 12.38% | - | - |
| 348 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 12.36% | - | - |
| 349 | Ryzen 7 5800HS with Radeon Graphics | 12.22% | - | - |
| 350 | T550 Laptop GPU | 12.13% | - | - |
성능 순위(351위 ~ 400위)
| 순위 | 그래픽카드 | 성능 비교 (VS RTX 4090) |
가격 | |
| 달러($) | 원(￦) | |||
| 1 | GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.00% | 1,599.00 | 2,078,700 |
| 351 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | 12.12% | - | - |
| 352 | Ryzen 7 6800H with Radeon Graphics | 12.11% | - | - |
| 353 | Radeon Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z | 12.10% | - | - |
| 354 | GRID RTX6000P-6Q | 12.06% | - | - |
| 355 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | 12.06% | - | - |
| 356 | Radeon R9 M395X | 12.06% | - | - |
| 357 | GeForce GTX 760 | 12.05% | 149.00 | 193,700 |
| 358 | FirePro S10000 | 12.04% | - | - |
| 359 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | 12.03% | 132.20 | 171,860 |
| 360 | Radeon Sky 500 | 11.96% | - | - |
| 361 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z with Radeon Graphics | 11.94% | - | - |
| 362 | GRID P40-24Q | 11.94% | - | - |
| 363 | Radeon R9 370 | 11.92% | 159.99 | 207,987 |
| 364 | Ryzen 7 6800U with Radeon Graphics | 11.89% | - | - |
| 365 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | 11.82% | - | - |
| 366 | Radeon HD 7870 | 11.73% | 176.00 | 228,800 |
| 367 | B8DKMDAP | 11.51% | - | - |
| 368 | Radeon Pro 465 | 11.46% | - | - |
| 369 | GeForce GTX 580 | 11.45% | 139.92 | 181,896 |
| 370 | GeForce MX550 | 11.43% | - | - |
| 371 | FirePro S7000 | 11.42% | 246.54 | 320,502 |
| 372 | GRID T4-8Q | 11.41% | - | - |
| 373 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | 11.38% | - | - |
| 374 | Radeon R7 370 | 11.37% | - | - |
| 375 | Radeon HD 7870 XT | 11.29% | - | - |
| 376 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | 11.27% | - | - |
| 377 | GRID M60-1B | 11.25% | - | - |
| 378 | P104-100 | 11.24% | 299.99 | 389,987 |
| 379 | Citrix Indirect Display Adapter | 11.23% | - | - |
| 380 | GRID P6-4Q | 11.18% | - | - |
| 381 | Quadro P1000 | 11.15% | 289.99 | 376,987 |
| 382 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 11.02% | 144.00 | 187,200 |
| 383 | FirePro W7000 Adapter | 11.01% | - | - |
| 384 | Radeon Ryzen 5 7535HS | 10.97% | - | - |
| 385 | GRID GTX P40-6 | 10.96% | - | - |
| 386 | Tesla K20m | 10.94% | - | - |
| 387 | Quadro M2200 | 10.92% | 249.99 | 324,987 |
| 388 | Quadro K4200 | 10.91% | 249.00 | 323,700 |
| 389 | Radeon R9 270 | 10.87% | - | - |
| 390 | Radeon Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core | 10.82% | - | - |
| 391 | GRID RTX6000P-4Q | 10.81% | - | - |
| 392 | GeForce GTX 775M | 10.79% | - | - |
| 393 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | 10.76% | 213.16 | 277,108 |
| 394 | GRID M60-1Q | 10.73% | - | - |
| 395 | FirePro W7000 | 10.70% | 278.05 | 361,465 |
| 396 | RTXA6000-8Q | 10.70% | - | - |
| 397 | NVIDIA A40-4Q | 10.68% | - | - |
| 398 | Ryzen 9 6900HX with Radeon Graphics | 10.63% | - | - |
| 399 | Radeon RX 5300M | 10.60% | - | - |
| 400 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | 10.50% | - | - |
마무리
RTX 40시리즈도 이렇게 성능이 좋은데 차세대 50시리즈는 얼마나 좋을까요.
고성능 그래픽카드로 구현될 가상 세계의 화려한 그래픽이 기대됩니당!
※ 패스마크 : 그래픽카드 벤치마크 비교 사이트
PassMark Video Card (GPU) Benchmarks - High End Video Cards
Video Card Benchmarks - Over 1,000,000 Video Cards and 3,900 Models Benchmarked and compared in graph form - This page contains a graph which includes benchmark results for high end Video Cards - such as recently released ATI and nVidia video cards using t
www.videocardbenchmark.net
끝까지 읽어주셔서 감사합니다.
공감과 구독, 그리고 댓글은
저의 블로그 활동에
큰 원동력이 됩니다.
오늘도 좋은하루 보내세요♥
AI 그림 사이트(무료)
"AI 그림"은 인공지능 기술을 사용하여 생성된 그림을 말합니다. 이러한 그림들은 일반적으로 GAN (Generative Adversarial Networks), VAE (Variational Autoencoder) 등의 딥러닝 알고리즘을 사용하여 만들어집니
sugarlessgum.tistory.com
챗GPT 사용법과 질문(프롬프트) 작성 팁
챗 GPT란 챗 GPT는 GPT(Generative Pre-trained Transformer) 시리즈의 일부로서, OpenAI에서 학습된 대형 언어 모델입니다. 2021년 이전까지의 대규모의 자연어 데이터를 학습하여 자연어 생성 및 이해에 대한
sugarlessgum.tistory.com
엔비디아 GTX와 RTX 차이점
엔비디아 GTX와 엔비디아 RTX 차이점 엔비디아는 Giga Texel Shader eXtreme(GTX) 및 Ray Tracing Texel eXtreme(RTX)의 두 가지 주요 그래픽 카드 라인을 제공합니다. GTX와 RTX 카드는 서로 다른 기능과 아키텍처를
sugarlessgum.tistory.com
무료 로고 제작 [추천 사이트 3곳]
무료 로고 제작 사이트 무료로 로고를 제작해주는 사이트 3곳을 소개합니다. 로그인이 필요없고 무료로 제작이 가능하며, 캡쳐하는데도 워터마크나 격자무늬 같은 캡쳐방지가 없는 곳으로만 정
sugarlessgum.tistory.com
